Call for Reviewers

Call for Reviewers

 

The 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, Collaborative Research for Excellence in Economics and Social Sciences – ICESS 2019 will implement a blind peer-review process.

The fair and timely review process done by the reviewers is the key factor for the selection of high quality papers for presentation and publication. We greatly appreciate reviewers for their contribution to the success of the conference.

Applications to join the Scientific Committee are invited from academics, experts and specialists in the fields of Economics and Social Sciences covering the research topics of the conference.

If you would like to be considered as a member of the Scientific Committee, please fill in the following form and click on the "Submit" button.

Last name:
Please, write your name in UPPER case, only (e.g., SMITH)

First Name:
Please, write all your first names, by capitalizing each one (e.g., John Peter)

Title:
Applicants must have significant publishing and reviewing experience.

Position:

Institution/organization/affiliation:

Town/City:

Country:

Phone:

E-mail address:

I would like to review papers submitted for the following tracks:

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

When reviewing a paper considered for oral presentation and publication, reviewers must take into consideration the following ethical standards:
1. Papers will be reviewed based on their intellectual merit and contribution to the aims and scope of the conference, as well as on the criteria presented in the review process. The reviewers should adhere to standards of fairness, integrity, and objectivity. Kindly note that personal criticism is unacceptable.
2. Reviewers who feel that their review comments might be biased and/or unqualified regarding a particular submitted paper to the conference should notify the Organizing Committee immediately and excuse themselves from the review process.
3. Reviewers should be clear in their review comments and provide proper explanations and arguments for their decisions. If there is any suspicion about the originality of the paper, reviewers are expected to notify the Organizing Committee immediately, with the appropriate arguments.
4. During the review process, reviewers will keep in mind at all times that the paper and related materials are confidential.
5. Reviewers warrant that they will not use the papers and related materials submitted to the conference for any other purpose than the blind peer-review process.